MATRE, Dagfinn; SKOGSTAD, M.; STERUD, T.; NORDBY, K-C.; KNARDAHL, S.; CHRISTENSEN, JO; LIE, J-AS. (2021). Safety incidents associated with extended working hours. A systematic review and meta-analysis - INVASSAT
Ves enrere MATRE, Dagfinn; SKOGSTAD, M.; STERUD, T.; NORDBY, K-C.; KNARDAHL, S.; CHRISTENSEN, JO; LIE, J-AS. (2021). Safety incidents associated with extended working hours. A systematic review and meta-analysis
MATRE, Dagfinn; SKOGSTAD, M.; STERUD, T.; NORDBY, K-C.; KNARDAHL, S.; CHRISTENSEN, JO; LIE, J-AS. (2021). Safety incidents associated with extended working hours. A systematic review and meta-analysis
MATRE, Dagfinn; SKOGSTAD, M.; STERUD, T.; NORDBY, K-C.; KNARDAHL, S.; CHRISTENSEN, JO; LIE, J-AS. Safety incidents associated with extended working hours: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health [en línea]. 2021. 11 p. [Consulta: 14.04.2021]. ISSN: 1795-990X. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3958.
Objetivo: Realizamos una revisión sistemática para evaluar las posibles consecuencias de las horas de trabajo extendidas en accidentes, cuasi accidentes, incidentes de seguridad y lesiones (incidentes) considerando la certeza general de la evidencia. Métodos: se realizaron búsquedas sistemáticas en cinco bases de datos (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science y Proquest Health and safety Science Abstract) e identificamos 10072 estudios publicados hasta diciembre de 2020. Veintidós estudios cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Seguimos un enfoque sistemático para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo y sintetizar los resultados en un metanálisis. La certeza de la evidencia se determinó mediante una versión modificada de The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Conclusiones: La jornada laboral diaria> 12 horas y la jornada laboral semanal superior a 55 horas se asoció y aumentó el riesgo de incidentes. El nivel de evidencia fue bajo. Por lo tanto, se justifica una mayor investigación de alta calidad para dilucidar estas asociaciones.
Objectiu: Realitzem una revisió sistemàtica per a avaluar les possibles conseqüències de les hores de treball esteses en accidents, quasi accidents, incidents de seguretat i lesions (incidents) considerant la certesa general de l'evidència. Mètodes: es van realitzar cerques sistemàtiques en cinc bases de dades (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science i Proquest Health and safety Science Abstract) i identifiquem 10072 estudis publicats fins a desembre de 2020. Vint-i-dos estudis van complir els criteris d'inclusió. Seguim un enfocament sistemàtic per a avaluar el risc de biaix i sintetitzar els resultats en una metanàlisi. La certesa de l'evidència es va determinar mitjançant una versió modificada de The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Conclusions: La jornada laboral diària> 12 hores i la jornada laboral setmanal superior a 55 hores es va associar i va augmentar el risc d'incidents. El nivell d'evidència va ser baix. Per tant, es justifica una major investigació d'alta qualitat per a dilucidar aquestes associacions.
Objective: We performed a systematic review to assess potential consequences of extended working hours on accidents, near-accidents, safety incidents and injuries (incidents) by considering the overall certainty of evidence. Methods: We searched five databases systematically (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Proquest Health and safety Science Abstract) and identified 10072 studies published until December 2020. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. We followed a systematic approach to evaluate risk of bias and synthesize results in a meta-analysis. The certainty of evidence was determined by a modified version of The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: Our analyses indicated an association between working >12 hours/day (RR: 1.24, 95%CI: 1.11, 1.40), or working >55 hours/week (RR: 1.24, 95%CI: 0.98, 1.57), and elevated risk of incidents. The certainty of evidence evaluated as low. Weak or no associations were observed for other exposure contrasts: working >8 hours/day (RR: 0.93, 95%CI: 0.72, 1.19), or working overtime (RR: 1.08, 95%CI: 0.75, 1.55), working 41-48 hours/week (RR: 1.02, 95%CI: 0.92, 1.13) or 49-54 hours/week (RR: 1.02, 95%CI: 0.97, 1.07). The certainty of evidence was evaluated as low (very low for 41-48 hours/week). Conclusions: Daily working hours >12 hours and weekly working hours exceeding 55 hours was associated and increased risk of incidents. The level of evidence was low. Hence, further high-quality research is warranted to elucidate these associations.